Surds and indices
Surds 1.02
- Surd: an irrational root — such as or — left in exact form rather than evaluated as a rounded decimal.
- Simplifying: extract the largest perfect-square factor, e.g. .
- Multiplying: , e.g. .
- Adding/subtracting: surds combine only once they share the same irrational part, e.g. .
- Rationalising a single surd denominator: multiply top and bottom by that surd, e.g. .
- Rationalising a binomial denominator : multiply by its conjugate , since removes the root entirely.
- Two surds only look 'unlike' if they haven't yet been simplified — always simplify every surd in an expression before deciding whether terms combine.
- Rationalising with a conjugate works because is a difference of two squares — the same idea used to remove a root from any binomial denominator.
Indices 1.02
- for any
- , and more generally
- These laws apply equally to algebraic bases (e.g. ), not only numerical ones.
- A fractional index is a root and a power combined; take the root first where possible, since it keeps the numbers smaller, e.g. rather than (same answer, harder arithmetic).
- A negative index and a negative value are unrelated ideas — is small and positive, not negative; don't let the word 'negative' bleed from the index into the result.
Worked example
Worked example
Simplify fully.
Show worked solution
Simplify each surd separately:
All three now share the irrational part , so they combine directly:
Quadratics and the discriminant
The discriminant and completing the square 1.02
- Discriminant of : .
- The completed-square form gives the turning point directly: the vertex of is .
- Discriminant test on : two distinct real roots when ; one repeated real root when ; no real roots (a complex-conjugate pair) when .
- The quadratic formula, , is exactly completing the square carried out once, in general, on .
- Divide the whole quadratic by so the coefficient of is (skip this step if ).
- Halve the coefficient of and write as .
- Substitute back and simplify to reach the vertex form .
- The discriminant is the fastest route to 'how many times does this line meet this curve' — substitute the line into the curve's equation, form the resulting quadratic, and inspect without solving anything further.
- Completing the square and the quadratic formula always agree — if a quick check by formula gives a different answer to a completed-square method, the error is in the algebra, not a discrepancy between methods.
Worked examples
Worked example
Solve:
by completing the square, giving your answer in exact surd form.
Show worked solution
Divide by 2:
Complete the square on :
so:
Taking square roots:
So:
As a check, the quadratic formula gives:
confirming the same result.
Worked example
Find the values of for which the line is a tangent to the curve .
Show worked solution
At an intersection, , so .
A tangent meets the curve at exactly one point, so this quadratic must have a repeated root: .
Here:
so , giving:
Simultaneous equations and inequalities
Simultaneous equations (linear and quadratic) 1.02
- Example: and give , so , i.e. and . The solutions are and .
- Tangency: meets where , with . The line is a tangent when , meets the curve twice when , and misses it when .
- Rearrange the linear equation to make one variable the subject.
- Substitute that expression into the quadratic equation.
- Solve the resulting one-variable quadratic (factorising, completing the square, or the formula).
- Substitute each root back into the linear equation to find its paired value of the other variable.
- A quadratic typically has two roots, so expect (and check for) two pairs of solutions — stopping after the first pair is a very common error.
- The number of solution pairs matches the discriminant of the resulting quadratic: two pairs if , one repeated pair if , none if (the line does not meet the curve).
- Substituting the linear equation into the quadratic (rather than the reverse) keeps the algebra manageable — substituting a rearranged quadratic into the linear equation instead usually creates unnecessary square roots.
Quadratic inequalities 1.02
- or — outside the roots, since is an upward-opening parabola.
- Solve the corresponding equation to find the critical values (the roots).
- Sketch the parabola, or draw a sign diagram, across those critical values.
- Read off the region(s) satisfying the inequality from the sign of the expression in each region.
- Never divide or multiply a quadratic inequality by an expression whose sign is unknown; always work from the critical values and a sign diagram instead of manipulating the inequality algebraically as if it were an equation.
- A common slip is stating the solution the wrong way round — for an upward-opening parabola, '' is satisfied outside the roots and '' between them; sketching the parabola removes any doubt.
Worked example
Worked example
Solve the inequality .
Show worked solution
Factorise: the discriminant is:
and , so the roots are:
giving or:
So:
This is an upward-opening parabola, so it is between its roots: .
Polynomials and the factor theorem
The factor and remainder theorems 1.02
- Remainder theorem: when a polynomial is divided by , the remainder equals .
- Factor theorem: is a factor of if and only if — the special case of the remainder theorem where the remainder is zero.
- Shortlist candidate roots using the factor pairs of the constant term (for integer coefficients).
- Test each candidate by evaluating until is found.
- Divide by (by algebraic long division or comparing coefficients) to reduce a cubic to a quadratic.
- Solve the resulting quadratic by the usual methods to complete the factorisation.
- Try first when shortlisting candidate roots — they cost almost nothing to check and often work for exam-style polynomials.
- The remainder theorem also works for a divisor : dividing by it evaluates at , not at — a common source of error when the leading coefficient isn't .
Algebraic and partial fractions
Algebraic and partial fractions 1.02
- Algebraic fractions combine and simplify by the same rules as numerical fractions: a common denominator for addition and subtraction, and cancelling shared factors (never shared terms) for simplification.
- Partial fractions reverse the process of combining fractions over a common denominator: .
- A repeated linear factor requires two separate terms: .
- An irreducible quadratic factor requires a linear numerator, not a constant: .
- Write the fraction as a sum with unknown constants over each factor, using the repeated-factor and quadratic-factor rules above where relevant.
- Multiply both sides by the original denominator to clear all fractions.
- Find each constant by substituting values of that eliminate all but one unknown (usually the roots of each linear factor), then compare remaining coefficients for any unknowns not yet found.
- A common error is cancelling an that appears in a sum rather than as a factor of the entire numerator and denominator — e.g. wrongly cancelling the 's in , which is not valid.
- Before splitting into partial fractions, check the numerator's degree is strictly less than the denominator's — an improper fraction needs polynomial division first to extract a whole-number part.
Worked example
Worked example
Express:
in partial fractions.
Show worked solution
Since is a repeated factor, write:
Multiplying through by :
Substituting : , so .
Substituting : , so .
Comparing coefficients (the left side has none): , so .
Therefore:
Functions and transformations of graphs
Domain, range and composite functions 1.02
- Domain: the set of inputs for which a function is defined.
- Range: the resulting set of outputs — both domain and range must be stated alongside the function itself to describe it fully.
- Division by zero and square roots of negative numbers are the two most common sources of domain restriction: is undefined at ; requires .
- A composite function means apply first, then to the result: .
- The domain of a composite must respect both the domain of and the domain of applied to 's output — a value of can be excluded even if it lies in the domain of alone, if then falls outside the domain of .
- Finding the range often needs a sketch or knowledge of the parent function's shape rather than pure algebra — e.g. the range of is , read directly from the graph's minimum.
Inverse functions and graph transformations 1.02
- Inverse function : the function that undoes , satisfying and .
- An inverse exists only where is one-to-one on its domain (each output comes from exactly one input).
- The graph of is the reflection of in the line .
- Write .
- Swap and .
- Rearrange the new equation to make the subject; this rearranged expression is .
- Graph transformations follow consistent rules: shifts vertically by ; shifts horizontally by (opposite to the sign of ); stretches vertically by factor ; stretches horizontally by factor .
- When combining several transformations, apply them in the order the function is built up algebraically — check the result by tracking what happens to one known point on the original graph.
- only exists on the whole domain of if is one-to-one there; where it isn't, the domain must first be restricted (e.g. to ) before an inverse can be defined.
Worked example
Worked example
Find for:
, and state its domain.
Show worked solution
Write:
and swap and :
Multiply out:
so:
Collect -terms:
so:
giving:
So:
with domain (the value excluded from 's range).
As a check, composing simplifies back to for all .
Per disputationem veritatem quaerimus